Cloven Hoof

By Gabriel Lucas Jackson aka Raphael Wolftone Quinlivan Masters

Buy Now

The genesis of this book lies in a persistent observation: that the term "Satanism" evokes immediate, often visceral, reactions, frequently rooted in fear, misinformation, and a deeply ingrained cultural apprehension of the adversarial. For centuries, the figure of Satan has been a potent symbol, a repository for humanity's anxieties about evil, transgression, and the unknown. Yet, the lived reality of individuals and groups who identify with Satanism is remarkably diverse, often diverging significantly from the caricatures painted by historical accusers, moral panics, and popular media. This study embarks on a journey to excavate the historical strata of Satanic thought and practice, moving from the ancient, foundational concepts of adversarial forces that laid the groundwork for later mythologies, to the multifaceted contemporary expressions that exist today.

Our exploration will not shy away from the uncomfortable truths or the sensationalized narratives that have long dominated public perception. Instead, we will approach these with critical rigor, aiming to differentiate between historical accusations of devil worship, the sociological phenomena of moral panics, and the self-identified beliefs and practices of modern Satanic movements. The central aim is to provide a comprehensive, nuanced, and historically grounded understanding of Satanism, one that acknowledges its evolution, its internal diversity, and its philosophical underpinnings. By tracing the trajectory of Satan as a figure in religious and cultural discourse, and by examining the distinct lineages of both theistic and non-theistic Satanism, we seek to offer a more informed perspective on a subject too often relegated to the realm of myth and demonization. This work is an invitation to move beyond preconceived notions and to engage with the subject matter with intellectual honesty and a commitment to accurate representation.

The history of human belief is inextricably linked to the concept of opposition. Across diverse cultures and epochs, the need to understand, personify, and grapple with forces that challenge order, goodness, and existence itself has given rise to powerful adversarial figures. While the Abrahamic traditions, particularly Christianity, have indelibly shaped the Western perception of Satan as the ultimate embodiment of evil, the roots of this symbolic adversary extend far deeper into antiquity. This book endeavors to unravel the complex and often misunderstood phenomenon of Satanism, tracing its historical lineage not just through the lens of demonology, but as a significant, albeit often maligned, thread in the tapestry of religious and philosophical thought.

We begin by acknowledging the foundational role of ancient adversarial concepts, such as the dualistic principles found in Zoroastrianism, where a primordial spirit of destruction actively opposes a benevolent creator. This fundamental notion of a cosmic struggle between opposing forces provided fertile ground for the subsequent development of figures like the Abrahamic Satan. The historical narrative is also deeply interwoven with the phenomenon of accusations of devil worship. From the infernal imagery of medieval witch trials to the moral panics of more recent times, the charge of Satanic allegiance has served as a potent tool for social control, religious persecution, and the expulsion of perceived societal deviants. This book will critically examine these historical episodes, distinguishing between the social anxieties that fueled them and the actual beliefs of those targeted.

Furthermore, contemporary Satanism is far from monolithic. It encompasses a spectrum of beliefs, ranging from theistic Satanism, which reveres Satan as a divine entity, to the far more prevalent non-theistic or atheistic forms, which utilize Satan as a symbol of individualism, rebellion against arbitrary authority, and the pursuit of earthly pleasures and enlightenment. Movements such as the Church of Satan and The Satanic Temple, while sharing a common rejection of traditional religious dogma, operate on distinct philosophical platforms. Our exploration will delve into these different manifestations, analyzing the literary, occult, and philosophical influences—from the poetry of Milton to the esoteric philosophies of Aleister Crowley and the foundational tenets established by Anton LaVey—that have shaped modern Satanic thought. We will also address the sociological dimensions, considering the demographics of those who identify with Satanic principles and the transformative impact of digital technologies on the dissemination and evolution of these beliefs in the 21st century. This work aims to provide a comprehensive, dispassionate, and historically informed account, moving beyond sensationalism to foster a deeper understanding of Satanism in its multifaceted reality.

The Shadow of the Adversary: Ancient Roots

Humanity's earliest attempts to comprehend the universe were often framed by a profound sense of struggle. Before the codified narratives of monotheistic traditions, and long before the figure of a singular, malevolent adversary named Satan emerged, ancient cultures grappled with the fundamental duality inherent in existence. These were not always moral dualities in the later Abrahamic sense, but rather existential and cosmic conflicts that shaped their understanding of reality. The very fabric of the cosmos, they believed, was woven from the tension between opposing forces: order and chaos, light and darkness, creation and destruction, life and death. This primordial cosmic duel provided a framework for understanding the world, its origins, and its ongoing transformations.

In the fertile crescent of Mesopotamia, early cosmologies teemed with tales of titanic battles that established the very order of the universe. The Babylonian creation epic, the Enuma Elish, stands as a prime example. At its heart is the violent struggle between the primordial god of chaos, Tiamat, a monstrous sea goddess, and the younger, heroic god Marduk. Tiamat, representing the untamed, salty depths of the primeval ocean, threatened to engulf the nascent order. Marduk, empowered by the gods, confronts and slays Tiamat, cleaving her body in two. From one half, he forms the heavens, and from the other, he constructs the earth. This foundational myth is not about an eternal embodiment of evil battling a good god, but rather about the necessary struggle to bring order out of chaos. Tiamat, while vanquished, embodies a potent, primal force that must be subdued for the ordered world to exist. Her defeat is not the end of chaos, but its containment within a structured cosmos, a constant tension that defines existence. This battle is a cosmic necessity, a violent birth pang for the universe, highlighting a worldview where creation itself is born from conflict.

Further south, in ancient Egypt, a similar cosmic struggle permeated their religious thought, though often personified through different archetypes. The central conflict here was frequently between Ma'at, the goddess embodying truth, justice, order, and cosmic balance, and her antithesis, Isfet. Isfet represented chaos, injustice, falsehood, and disorder, the fundamental threat to the divinely ordained order of the universe.

Pharaohs, as divine intermediaries, were tasked with upholding Ma'at, ensuring the stability of Egypt and the cosmos against the encroaching forces of Isfet. While Isfet was not a singular, anthropomorphic figure of evil in the same way Satan would later become, it represented a pervasive, antagonistic principle that was constantly seeking to unravel the established order. The annual flooding of the Nile, a life-giving force, could also be destructive, illustrating the Egyptian understanding of how

creation and destruction were intrinsically linked, two sides of the same cosmic coin. The battles fought by the sun god Ra against the serpent Apophis each night in the underworld further illustrate this persistent struggle. Apophis, a being of pure chaos and darkness, sought to swallow Ra and plunge the world into eternal night. Ra's victory, achieved daily, was essential for the sun to rise, reaffirming the ongoing, cyclical nature of this cosmic duel. Each sunrise was a triumph over chaos, a testament to the enduring power of order, but the threat of Apophis always loomed, representing the ever-present possibility of chaos reasserting itself.

Moving westward, the ancient Greeks also wrestled with the concept of primal conflict. Their cosmogonies often featured primordial deities representing fundamental forces, engaged in struggles that shaped the world. The Titanomachy, the war between the Olympian gods and their predecessors, the Titans, is a prime example. Zeus and his siblings overthrew their father, Cronus, and the ruling generation of Titans, establishing the reign of the Olympians. This was a transition of power, a shift in cosmic order, rather than a battle between good and evil. However, within Greek mythology, there were also figures and forces that embodied chaos and opposition. The monstrous offspring of Typhon and Echidna, such as Cerberus, the Hydra, and the Chimera, represented monstrous, chaotic forces that threatened the ordered world and had to be subdued by heroes. Typhon himself was a terrifying, serpentine giant, a formidable force of destruction that challenged Zeus for dominion over the cosmos. His defeat secured the rule of the Olympians and the continuation of the established order. The Greek worldview, while not strictly dualistic in a moral sense, recognized the power of chaotic, destructive forces that were integral to the cosmic narrative and the ongoing struggle for stability.

The ancient Indo-European peoples, from whom many of these earlier mythologies drew inspiration or shared common roots, also possessed a rich tapestry of myths that spoke of cosmic struggles. Many of these traditions contained narratives about the primal battle between gods and beings of darkness or chaos. The concept of a

sky-god, often associated with order and light, contending with chthonic, serpentine, or chaotic forces, is a recurring theme. These battles were often seen as essential for the maintenance of cosmic balance and the continuation of life. The cyclical nature of these conflicts, where order is established, then challenged, then re-established, is a hallmark of these early worldviews. They reflect a deep-seated human intuition that existence itself is a dynamic process, forged in the crucible of opposing forces, where light constantly contends with shadow, and order with the ever-present potential for dissolution.

These ancient cosmologies, though diverse in their specific figures and narratives, share a fundamental commonality: the idea of a cosmic duel. This wasn't necessarily a war between a divine good and an independent evil entity, but rather a more complex understanding of existence as a dynamic interplay of opposing forces. Order required the subjugation of chaos; light could not be understood without darkness; creation was intrinsically linked to destruction. These primal conflicts laid the psychological and mythological groundwork for later, more explicitly dualistic belief systems. They established the archetype of the adversary – not necessarily a malevolent being, but a powerful force that challenges, disrupts, and ultimately defines the existing order.

This foundational understanding of cosmic struggle is crucial for tracing the evolution of adversarial concepts, providing a rich soil from which the later, more defined figure of Satan would eventually sprout, but it is important to recognize that this sprouting occurred within specific historical and cultural contexts, particularly within the Abrahamic traditions.

The exploration of these early dualistic worldviews reveals that the concept of opposition, conflict, and antagonistic forces is deeply embedded in the human psyche and has been a cornerstone of cosmological thinking across cultures for millennia.

These ancient myths demonstrate that the struggle between opposing principles—be it order and chaos, light and darkness, or creation and destruction—was not merely a background element but was often the very engine of creation and the defining characteristic of the cosmos. In Mesopotamia, Marduk's battle with Tiamat established the ordered universe from the remnants of primordial chaos. The Egyptians' constant struggle to maintain Ma'at against Isfet, and Ra's nightly triumph over Apophis, underscored the ongoing, cyclical nature of this cosmic tension essential for life and stability. Similarly, Greek mythology depicted the Olympian gods overcoming the chaotic forces of the Titans and monsters like Typhon to establish their reign. These narratives, predating the Abrahamic conception of Satan, illustrate a universal human need to make sense of the inherent duality and conflict within existence. They establish the archetype of the adversary as a fundamental force, a necessary counterpoint, without which the very concept of order, light, or creation would lose its meaning. This deep-seated understanding of cosmic struggle provides the essential backdrop against which the later development of specific adversarial figures, such as Angra Mainyu in Zoroastrianism, and ultimately, Satan in Abrahamic religions, can be properly understood, showing that the stage was set long before the particular characters entered the cosmic drama. These myths demonstrate that the tension between opposing forces is not an aberration but an intrinsic aspect of the universe, a continuous dynamic that shapes reality and provides the very definition of

existence. The emergence of a distinct, personified figure of evil, therefore, can be seen as a later, more specific articulation of these ancient, pervasive themes of cosmic opposition and inherent struggle, a development that would take a significant turn with the rise of Persian and later Abrahamic religious thought.

The concept of a singular, malevolent adversary, a primordial force of opposition to the divine, finds one of its most profound and influential early expressions in the ancient Persian religion of Zoroastrianism. Unlike the more nebulous forces of chaos depicted in earlier Mesopotamian, Egyptian, or Greek cosmologies, Zoroastrianism introduced a distinctly dualistic theological framework, positing a cosmic battle between a benevolent creator god and an equally potent, actively destructive spirit. This structured antagonism, embodied by Angra Mainyu (also known as Ahriman), represents a significant departure and a crucial evolutionary step in the conceptualization of evil within religious thought, laying fertile ground for later adversarial figures in other traditions.

At the heart of Zoroastrian theology lies the fundamental principle of dualism, a belief system that divides the universe into two opposing, often irreconcilable, forces. The paramount figure is Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord, the uncreated, benevolent creator god who is the source of all that is good, light, truth, and life. In stark opposition stands Angra Mainyu, the Destructive Spirit, the embodiment of all that is evil, darkness, falsehood, and death. Zoroastrianism asserts that these two primal spirits, Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu, are co-eternal, existing from the beginning, though their essential natures are diametrically opposed. This is not a scenario where good creates evil, nor where evil is merely the absence of good; rather, it is a belief in two independent, active principles locked in an eternal struggle for dominion over the cosmos. This cosmic conflict, the Gathas, the oldest hymns of Zoroastrianism attributed to the prophet Zoroaster himself, are replete with references to this fundamental cosmic battle. They describe a world created by Ahura Mazda for the purpose of offering choice, where humanity must align themselves with either the forces of good or the forces of evil.

The nature of Angra Mainyu is that of an active, sentient being, fundamentally antithetical to Ahura Mazda's creative and life-affirming essence. Where Ahura Mazda is associated with the celestial realms, with light and order, Angra Mainyu originates from the abyssal darkness, the realm of non-being and corruption. His primary motivation is not simply to exist, but to corrupt, destroy, and ultimately annihilate Ahura Mazda's creation. This destructive impulse is not born of a flawed nature within Ahura Mazda, but rather from Angra Mainyu's own inherent malice and envy.

He is portrayed as a being who willingly chose his path of destruction, a stark contrast to the benevolent choices of Ahura Mazda and those who follow the path of righteousness. This fundamental divergence in will and nature fuels the cosmic war that permeates the Zoroastrian worldview.

Angra Mainyu's primary method of waging war against Ahura Mazda is through the creation of daevas (demons or malignant spirits). These are not mere abstract forces but active agents of corruption, each embodying a particular vice or destructive tendency. They are the antithesis of the Amesha Spentas, the benevolent, immortal beings or divine emanations that serve Ahura Mazda. The daevas, led by Angra Mainyu, actively spread lies, disease, death, and discord throughout the material world, attempting to thwart Ahura Mazda's benevolent plan. The cosmic struggle, therefore, plays out not only in the spiritual realms but also, crucially, within the hearts and minds of humanity. Humans are endowed with free will, the capacity to choose between asha (truth, righteousness, cosmic order) and druj (lie, falsehood, disorder). By choosing asha, individuals align themselves with Ahura Mazda and strengthen his forces; by succumbing to druj, they inadvertently empower Angra Mainyu and his daevas. This emphasis on human agency in the cosmic battle is a cornerstone of Zoroastrian ethics and soteriology.

The influence of Angra Mainyu is insidious and pervasive. He is the tempter, the deceiver, the instigator of all that is impure and harmful. This extends to the natural world, where Angra Mainyu is credited with creating drought, famine, pestilence, and the corruption of the earth. His antithesis to Ahura Mazda's perfect creation is evident; where Ahura Mazda brought forth life, Angra Mainyu brings forth death and decay. He is the serpent in the garden, not merely a temptor but a primeval force of opposition who actively seeks to poison the very essence of existence. The doctrine of the Amesha Spentas, often described as aspects or emanations of Ahura Mazda, further highlights this duality. Each Amesha Spenta represents a positive attribute—good thought, truth, dominion, devotion, health, immortality—and Angra Mainyu and his daevas are seen as the embodiment of their corrupted opposites: evil thought, falsehood, disorder, disobedience, sickness, and mortality.

The Zoroastrian understanding of the cosmos is thus one of a continuous struggle, a battlefield where good and evil are in active, dynamic opposition. This is not a static universe but one in constant flux, defined by the choices made by its inhabitants. The sacred texts, particularly the Avesta, detail the ongoing conflict and the means by which the forces of good can triumph. This includes ritual purity, adherence to ethical principles, and the constant cultivation of good thoughts, good words, and

good deeds. The ultimate outcome of this cosmic war, however, is not a matter of doubt for the faithful. Zoroastrian eschatology, the doctrine of the last things, plays a crucial role in understanding the significance of Angra Mainyu.

Zoroastrian eschatology posits a future culmination of the cosmic struggle, a final renovation of the world. It is believed that Angra Mainyu, despite his immense power and millennia of opposition, will ultimately be defeated. This defeat is not a simple annihilation but a process of overcoming and purifying the evil that he has introduced into creation. At the end of time, a savior figure, the Saoshyant, will be born of Zoroaster's lineage, who will usher in a final renovation of the world, known as the Frashokereti. During this event, all the dead will be resurrected and judged. A molten metal ordeal will purify all humanity, with those who have aligned with Angra Mainyu experiencing the fiery ordeal as a painful purification, while the righteous pass through it unharmed. Ultimately, Angra Mainyu and his daevas will be vanquished, their destructive power rendered impotent, and the world will be restored to its original state of purity and perfection, a realm of eternal light and goodness under the sole sovereignty of Ahura Mazda.

This doctrine of a final victory over evil is profoundly significant. It offers a message of hope and ultimate triumph for the forces of good, assuring believers that the present struggles, however intense, are not in vain. The defeat of Angra Mainyu is not an arbitrary act of divine intervention but the logical and inevitable conclusion of the cosmic battle, a consequence of Ahura Mazda's ultimate wisdom and power. The ethical imperative to actively participate in this struggle, to choose righteousness and resist the temptations of evil, becomes paramount. Every act of goodness contributes to the eventual triumph, and every act of wickedness strengthens the forces of darkness.

The concept of Angra Mainyu as an ultimate evil figure, a distinct personification of destructive force, has been highly influential throughout religious history. While the detailed theological framework of Zoroastrianism might be unique, the underlying dualistic principle and the notion of a cosmic war against a powerful adversary have resonated in various forms across different cultures and religions. The stark moral dichotomy presented in Zoroastrianism, the active agency of a malevolent spirit, and the belief in a future resolution where good triumphs over evil, provided a potent and sophisticated articulation of the problem of evil. This early conceptualization offered a comprehensive answer to fundamental questions about the origin of suffering, the nature of morality, and humanity's place in a divinely ordained, yet fiercely contested, cosmos. It established a powerful archetype of the adversarial force that would later

find echoes in Gnosticism, Manichaeism, and, significantly, in the Abrahamic traditions, where the figure of Satan would emerge, bearing certain conceptual similarities to the ancient Persian Angra Mainyu, though also distinct in its specific theological developments. The Zoroastrian understanding of Angra Mainyu is thus a critical juncture in the history of religious thought, representing a sophisticated early attempt to grapple with the pervasive presence of evil in the world and to chart a course toward ultimate redemption and cosmic restoration. The enduring power of this concept lies in its clear delineation of opposing forces, its elevation of human moral choice, and its ultimate promise of a redeemed and perfected creation.

The intricate tapestry of ancient belief systems, which we have begun to explore, reveals a recurring fascination with forces of opposition, with a primal antagonist who challenges the established order or the benevolent will of the divine. While Zoroastrianism presented a sophisticated dualistic framework with Angra Mainyu as a cosmic adversary, other traditions, particularly those emerging from the Hellenistic world and later coalescing into what we now refer to as Gnosticism, developed even more complex and radical dualistic cosmologies. These systems, often characterized by profound pessimism regarding the material realm, introduce a creator figure distinctly different from the supreme, unknowable God. This figure, universally known as the Demiurge, stands at the heart of Gnostic thought and is intrinsically linked to the concept of an adversarial world.

Gnostic cosmologies are not monolithic; they comprise a diverse array of myths and theological elaborations that proliferated across the Mediterranean world from the 1st to the 4th centuries CE. However, a fundamental shared belief underlies most Gnostic systems: a radical separation between the spiritual and the material. At the apex of this spiritual hierarchy resides the Pleroma, a realm of divine fullness, inhabited by the ultimate, transcendent God, often referred to by various ineffable names, signifying an unknowable, perfect, and utterly incorporeal reality. This supreme deity is not directly involved in the messy, imperfect creation of the material universe. Instead, this creation is the work of a subordinate, lesser divine being—the Demiurge.

The nature and origin of the Demiurge vary between different Gnostic schools, but a common thread is his ignorance or even malevolence concerning the true divine reality. In many Gnostic myths, the Demiurge is conceived as an emanation from the Pleroma, a product of an error or flaw within the divine realm itself. A prevalent narrative, found in texts like the Apocryphon of John (also known as the Secret Book of John), describes the Demiurge, often named Yaldabaoth or Saklas, as arising from an

illicit desire or an uncontrolled impulse on the part of one of the Aeons (divine emanations) within the Pleroma. This uncontrolled emanation, desiring to create on its own without the consent or knowledge of the supreme God, becomes the architect of the material cosmos. Consequently, the Demiurge is depicted as a being of immense power but profound ignorance. He mistakenly believes himself to be the sole, supreme God, unaware of the true, higher God from whom he emanates. This ignorance is the fundamental flaw that underpins his creation.

Audio Book